Social Security is neither social nor secure.  It's not social because it is compulsory and it's not secure because it is not social.  Yet they call it Social Security.  

Social security is nothing more than the young paying for the old, their wages garnered by theft.  The Law is -- Thou shall not steal   --  but that does not apply to the Federal Government.  Social Security is the world's biggest Ponzi Scheme and as with all Ponzi Schemes, it will ultimately collapse.  Started as a "something for nothing" political idea in 1934, the first few million essentially reaped the benefits without paying essentially anything into the system. My grandfather was one of those.  He paid in for a few months and then received payments for at least a decade.   Decades later, both employers and companies have paid and paid with no guarantee of ever receiving any benefits.  Those who died before 62 certainly received nothing. The benefits of socialism --  promises, promises.  Ironically now it is referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment".

Irwin Schiff

The best book on this subject is, "The Social Security Swindle" by Irwin Schiff (1984).  It needs to be mentioned that Irwin Schiff, 87, died in Federal Prison in Ft. Worth Texas on October 16, 2015.  He was blind and chained to his bed.  This is the treatment political prisoners receive for writing books and telling the truth.  Schiff's book mentioned the seminal case of Flemming v. Nestor, 363 US 603 (1960).

Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 1104 of the 1935 Social Security Act.   In this Section, Congress reserved to itself the power to amend and revise the schedule of benefits.  You have no rights to Social Security whether you know it or not.  You are only entitled to what Congress on any particular day says what you should receive.

I predict that ultimately in an attempt to prevent a financial collapse, that the government will just reduce Social Security benefits, possibly to zero, as what are old people going to do about it. 

Flemming v. Nestor   363 U.S. 603 (1960)

Ephram Nestor challenged Section 1104 of the Social Security Act after he was denied Social Security payments as a deported member of the Communist Party.  He argued that a contract existed between himself and the United States government, since he had paid into the system for 19 years.

Nestor, an alien, became eligible for Social Security payments in 1955. In July 1956 he was deported for having been a member of the Communist Party from 1933 to 1939. Section 202(n) of the Social Security Act provided for the termination of Social Security payments when an alien is deported for being a member of the Communist Party.

The Court ruled that no such contract existed and that there is no contractual right to receive Social Security payments.  Payments due under Social Security are not “property” rights and are not protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause.  I guess your salary is not your property either yet the government steals it.

Under Due Process Clause analysis, government action is valid unless it is patently arbitrary and utterly lacking in rational justification. This provision of §202(n) is not irrational; it could have been justified by the desire to increase the purchasing power of those living in America because those living abroad would not spend their payments here.

Ephram Nestor challenged Section 1104 after he was denied Social Security payments as a deported member of the Communist Party. He argued that a contract existed between himself and the United States government since he had paid into the system for 19 years.  So much for being secure.

Social Security Numbers 

Another great government lie is that there exists a thing called Social Security Numbers.  So-called numbers typically have the form of 123-45-6789, an allegedly a 9 digit number.  Nothing could be more false.  Can you add or subtract two Social Security Numbers (SSN) together?  How about multiplying or dividing?  Now if you are really good, take the square root of "your" or anyone else's number and tell me what you get?

If you "have" a Social Security number, please tell me where it is located, how much it weighs, what color and size it is etc.  How hoodwinked can the American people be?  No, you don't have a number the government has millions of identifiers.

The SSN is not a number but an identifier, pure and simple.  It is your alter ego.  Now the IRS uses the phrase "Taxpayer Identification Number" well at least they are starting to tell the truth as there is no social nor security involved.  Social Security Cards till 1972 had the phrase "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" well that has all changed now.  George Orwell said that big brother is watching you and the main microscope in this effort is the Social Security Number.

The first Social Security cards were issued starting in 1936, they did not have this legend. Beginning with the sixth design version of the card, issued starting in 1946, SSA added a legend to the bottom of the card reading "FOR SOCIAL SECURITY PURPOSES -- NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION." This legend was removed as part of the design changes for the 18th version of the card, issued beginning in 1972. The legend has not been on any new cards issued since 1972.  When I was a kid the idea of the Social Security Card or number being used for identification was absolutely unheard of.  Well regardless of any reports to the contrary, George Orwell is alive and well and BIG BROTHER IS STILL WATCHING YOU.

The United States government has turned the country into a big jail.  Read the attached complaint and you will see reality in action.  Who said that Franz Kafka was not alive in 2017.  Surrealism in action. 



Francis R. Walker,                                              )                 
Plaintiff                                                             )
vs.                                                                    )

Rex Tillerson, U.S. Secretary of State                 )                   C.A. No. 17-CV-732

and                                                                   )

Director Passport Services, Dept. of State           )       

                             Defendants                          )


                                              AMENDED COMPLAINT IN EQUITY

Summary -- This is an action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1346(a)(2) (Officers of the U.S.); 28 U.S.C. §1361 (Mandamus); 28 U.S.C. §2201-2202(Declaratory and Injunctive Relief)  and 8 U.S.C. §1503 (Denial of Rights) which prays that this Court Order the State Department to issue a Passport to the plaintiff as well as other equitable relief.


Plaintiff, Francis R. Walker, is 
native-born U.S. Citizen, born on 12 April 1943 (age 74) and resides at XXX Easy Street,  Central  NC  28311

Rex Tillerson is the U.S. Secretary of State.  The State Department has the responsibility to issue U.S. Passports.  Karen A. Pizza is the Director of Passport Services of the U.S. Department of State

                                                        JURISDICTION AND VENUE

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 (Federal Question);  28 U.S.C. §1361 (Mandamus); 28 U.S.C. §2201-2202 (Declaratory and Injunctive Relief)  and 8 U.S.C. §1503 (Denial of Rights)
This Court has authority to issue declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
Venue in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(b).


Walker has been issued at least four U.S. Passports in his life with the first one being issued in about May 1967.  He presented his birth certificate as part of his passport application as proof of U.S.
birth place.
On May 10, 2107
, Walker submitted a renewal passport application with a picture, expired passport and fee to the National Passport Center in Sterling, VA via certified mail.
On or about June 10, 2107, Walker received from the National Passport Center a letter asking for certification that no Social Security Number had ever been issued to him.  Their identifying number is RE: 283315098
Walker signed the statement under penalty of perjury provided by the Passport Agency and mailed it back to them.
On or about 
31 July 2017,  Walker contacted the Passport Agency Information Center asking why after about 3 months why no passport had been issued.  The Center could not tell me and suggested that I write a letter to the Passport Center and have yet to receive a response.
Walker also contacted his congressman, Richard Hudson in an attempt to find out why no passport had been issued.
On or about 14 August 2017, Walker was visited by David Monroe, Special Agent for the U.S. Department of State, and about four County Sheriff’s deputies in unmarked cars.  All carrying guns and not smiling.  I believe that they came to arrest me.  This is the kind of thing that occurred in Stazi
East Germany.
Monroe and I had a conversation where Monroe told me that existing State Department records showed that State had a Social Security Identifier for me as 123-45-6789.  The four police did not arrest me and quietly left.
Why Monroe decided to drive 160 miles or so when a phone call would have sufficed is a good reason why the State Department budget needs to be reduced to eliminate waste.
At present Walker is not “in custody” nor subject to any criminal restraints.  Monroe told me that I did not have any record.
A David A.
Pomte (sic) writing for Karen A. Pizza, Director of Passport Services, in a letter dated 25 September 2017 and attached as an exhibit denied my application for a passport.
Pomte’s letter is full of lies.  The first lie is that I did not provide my correct Social Security Number.   Francis R. Walker was never issued a SSN and Walker has stated that fact at least three times under penalty of perjury.
Walker did not provide any SSN and did not  (from 
Pomte’s letter) “willfully, intentionally negligently or recklessly provides an incorrect or invalid Social Security Number.”
Pomte is a typical bureaucrat, full of power over the lives of others claiming to know the law when in fact he is extremely ignorant.  He is the kind of person whom Trump should fire.  If Karen A. Pizza knowingly tolerates this kind of incompetence then Pizza should be fired also.  Pomte playing God and lacking any real knowledge does not care how his actions affect the lives of others.   Why should I not be allowed to visit my sick brother in Spain? Furthermore, what does Social Security have to do with Passports?
Pomtewrote that Walker did not provide “your Social Security Number”.  This is another Pomte-State lie.  If I “have”, meaning ‘possess’,  a Social Security  Number, please tell me where it is.   Is it in my safe deposit box, on my right arm, hip pocket, left kidney etc. (you get the idea).  No, it is the government’s assigned and controlled “number”.    I realize that the average person does not ask questions of reality like that.  As a lifelong Chemical Engineer just like Galileo and Newton etc.   I hope I am able to separate fact from fiction. 
The so-called SSN is not a number at all because it does not have the characteristics of numbers.  Having studied Advanced Engineering Mathematics I feel qualified to make such a statement.  Can you divide say 2.34 or 5.67 into “your” Social Security
Number?  How about taking the square root of “your “ SSN or adding two “numbers” together and see what you get?  The SSN is not a number regardless of what 99.9% of the population believes.  This “number” thing is just another government lie.
Pomte needed a Social Security Identifier, then why did he not get it from EXISTING State Department records?  Too easy I guess.  It is easier to play dictator and prevent an innocent person from leaving the United States.  Do as I say and not as I do.  Pomte probably has a diplomatic passport.  What a hypocrite he is.

                                                                    LEGAL BASIS

One of the very basic unrenumerated rights of a citizen is to be free to leave and renter his country.  The International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rightswas ratified by the U.S. Senate on 8 June 1992.  Article 12 of this treaty guarantees the right of a citizen to enter and leave freely.
The privileges and immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution guarantees to Walker the privilege of entering and leaving the U.S.
 The Right to Travel is one of the unrenumerated rights in the Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 
Walker has been declared guilty by Act of Attainder of the Executive Branch without trial and is not allowed to leave the United States.  Bills of Attainder are violations of Article 1 Section 9 of the United States Constitution.
The United States government has in effect made the United States a prison, albeit a big prison, for those who do not have a passport.  One may not leave nor return absent a passport.

                                                           PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court:

Issue an Order in Mandamus ordering that the U.S. Passport Agency issue a passport to the plaintiff.

Declare that any law which prohibits the issuance or invalidation of a U.S. Passport absent criminal nexus, be declared to be a violation of the privileges clause, Ninth Amendment,  a Bill of Attainder in violation of Article 1 Section 9 of the United States Constitution and a violation of The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1746 --

“I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 5 October 2017



Francis R. Walker


I certify that I have placed a copy of this Amended Complaint in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid on 5 October 2017 to:

Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20530

United States Attorney

101 S. Edgeworth Street
Greensboro, NC 27401


Rex Tillerson
Secretary of State
2201 C St.  NW
Washington, D.C.  20520


Passport Services
Department of State
PO Box 1108
Sterling, VA 20166


Francis R. Walker


The following is a Rule 59 Motion that I filed after the March 7, 2018 dismissal of my complaint by District Judge Catherine Eagles.  It is the most sarcastic writing that I have ever done.  must reading.



Francis R. Walker,                                             )                 

Plaintiff                                   )

vs.                                                                        )


Rex Tillerson, U.S. Secretary of State                      )    C.A. No. 1:17-cv-732


et al                     Defendants                          )


 COMES NOW Francis R. Walker and prays that the Order and Judgment of March 7, 2018 be amended.

General Commentary

I was not surprised at the 25 page Judgment Order.  After all, the judges are terrified that the US Attorney might prosecute them or their family members if they are not sufficiently subservient of the government.  Stalin said, “Show me the man and I will show you the crime.”  So much for Separation of Powers and the Independence of the Judiciary.  The name of this country should be changed to the United States of Venezuela.

Everyone in the street knows that the Courts, Federal and State are corrupt and are nothing less than the hand maidens of big government and big business.  It is nice to know that U.S. citizens  have no statutory, Common Law,  Constitutional or Treaty protections and are really just hogs at the Orwell Animal Farm with attached identifying numbers.  It is exciting to know that in the future we can all expect to be tattooed or chip implanted so that there will be no confusion.  When Orwell called judges “dogs” he certainly knew what he was talking about.  US courts are really no different than the courts in Venezuela, Russia, Iran, North Korea or China.  The little guy is just an animal to serve at the government’s pleasure.  What did surprise me is the extent to which this court would be the servant for the government and publish lies and distortions of every kind to justify governmental lies.   As Lincoln said, This people of the government, by the government and for the government . . .

Background History

When FDR signed the Social Security Act in1935 it referred to a record keeping scheme.  It was feared that any number would be used NAZI style for identification cards.  Of course this possibility was then strenuously denied except that that is the current status  in the U.S. today, NAZI SS identification numbers. 

In 1957, probably before you were born,  I applied for a Social Security Card.  Just fill in a form send it in and a card arrived in the mail a while later.  No birth certificates etc.  I could have applied as Mickey M. Mouse and I am sure that I would have received a card. An account was opened so that the money stolen from my earnings could be deposited.  The card said believe it or not -- FOR SOCIAL SECURITY PURPOSES ONLY  NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION.  The idea or concept that this card or number would ever be a determinant for identification was at best surreal and worse a total joke.


This case is, besides the government telling lies, a case about evidence.  The government has produced a voluminous amount of “evidence”.  This so called evidence is not relevant because it does nothing to establish what was filed with the Social Security Administration in 1957.  The government’s Tennessee “evidence” is conspicuous for what it does not contain.  Namely an application to the Social Security Administration for a NAZI SS card.  In this case the government has NEVER produced any application to the Social Security Administration.  Neither for me nor Mickey M. Mouse.  Ever. 

All of the Tennessee materials are not relevant to the Social Security Administration.  The State of Tennessee does not create nor maintain social security information.  Maybe if I have a Social Security question I should call up the Department of Motor Vehicles or the Board of Elections.  Better yet if I get a speeding ticket or need an absentee ballot, should I contact the State Department for help?  Yet the government provides irrelevant and immaterial  Tennessee records to this court and this Court devours it like a hungry dog.  The Tennessee records neither support nor diminish as to what happened with the Social Security Administration in 1957 relevant to a Social Security application.

Burden of Proof

It is the government that says that Francis R. Walker has a social security number.  The burden is on them and NOT on me.  I am surprised that the government has not said that the Social Security building burned down and that is the reason why they never provided any SS application.  Well when the judge is in your hip pocket, there is no need to.

I know that I have never filed an application as Francis R. Walker with the Social Security Administration and that is why I continue to ask the same question and state under perjury that no such application exists.  I cannot provide what does not and never has existed unless I allow the government to suborn perjury and I tell a lie to make them happy.

Commentary to the Order

What we have in this case is the intersection of a passport application with a compelled birth certificate name and the requirement by the government of a Social Security alias name and number.  The applied SS name is an alias and the number is a derivative of that name.  However the government now states that I have to tell lies under penalty of perjury  in order to receive a passport full well knowing that Francis R. Walker never applied for a NAZI SS card.  I have learned in life that telling governmentally approved lies is always allowable.  Refusing to lie or telling the truth however always comes with risks and dangers.

The government position appears to be that I have to use a Birth Certificate name to apply for a passport but use an alias social security number derived under an alias name and they are happy with that kind of dishonesty and conflicting information.   

At the top of page 5 of the Order we learn that receiving SS benefits is not possible without obtaining a SS number.  Well I have never in my life received so much as one penny under the name of Francis R. Walker.  Continuing on page 5 all, and I mean all, of the government proffered exhibits are irrelevant and they should all be ignored as such.    See note 6 at the bottom of page 6.  It is irrelevant what the Tennessee Drivers Bureau does as far as the issuance of a U.S. passport.

On page 7 you referred to a 1974 passport application.  Why does this court not refer to the Original application in 1968 or any application for a SSN?    Are we going to pick and chose?  If the 1974 application said that my name was Mickey M. Mouse would that make it so?   Names are assigned at birth (1943) and not when someone is 31 years old.

The bottom of page 7 refers to me not denying etc.  No the burden is on the government and not on me.

Page 7 bottom.  Well if a jury trial were to be held and some witness said that I have a SSN then I would ask for a copy of the application.  They would not be able to produce it.  What are they then going to say, that I am the only person in history who was assigned a SSN without any application.  Further questioning would ask for the location of “my” SSN, its color, size and weight, if you could divide another  number into the SSN number, take its square root,  or if you could multiply two SS numbers together etc.   Maybe when we get the government’s  NAZI SSN’s tattooed on our arms, forehead, cheeks etc. then the courts can take judicial notice of the location of our social security numbers.

Middle of page 8.  The government has provided only irrelevant evidence and my numerous affidavits are uncontested with any SS application. 

Middle page 9,  I don’t have to offer any explanation of disparities. The burden is on the government.  No the litigation was triggered when the government refused to put down the number that it had as David Monroe, special State Department agent,  told me.

Bottom page 9. No reasonable jury could believe that I have a social security number absent an application especially after I asked any witness relevant questions about its mathematical characteristics, location, weight, color etc.  Let’s not forget that reasonable juries sent 20 people to the gallows in the Witch Trials in 1692-1693 using spectral evidence, another abomination similar to circumstantial evidence.  Every time that I hear of some person having spent 15, 20, 25 years in jail and was cleared by DNA, it turns my stomach.  Don’t tell me about juries in court which is little than a dog-and-pony show where the animals are controlled by the US Attorney.  The 99% conviction rate proves how fair criminal trials are.

On page 12  you state, “he can obtain full relief by filing another passport application with his correct social security number.” I need some legal help.  Should the application be in my Birth Certificate name with the number associated with my alias Social Security name or should the application be in my alias social security name with the alias social security number for that alias name?  Which set of lies should I pursue?   Can I now apply for a passport with just my social security card or will they still require a passport?  Will I need to pay another application fee or will the government just keep and steal my last fee?  The Passport Agency  will use vengeance as their modus operandi with me as they have in the past.  Unfortunately that will only lead to another law suit.

Page 13 middle.  Well if the passport application was missing a SSN why did not the State department just fill in the blank with whatever number would make them happy.  Especially when David Monroe, special State Department criminal investigator, told me that the State department already had a number for me.  No better to have an investigation, and civil action which has possibly cost $50,000 at the present time.  Costs for U.S. Marshal service, State department application people, records people, Hoke county Sheriff, Special investigator, Tennessee records, Lexis-Nexus computer searches, court time and costs as well as costs for the US Attorney.  The 25 page judgment probably required the better part of one week of your clerk’s time considering the detailed legal and historical factual statements.  An appeal is almost certain over the summary judgment and irrelevant evidence issues.  The 4th Circuit can play rubber stamp all that they want to but I don’t want the Court of Appeals’ judges ever to say that no one ever told them and hence were unaware of the issues.  At the bottom of the page is another lie.  My birth certificate was presented as evidence of citizenship with my original (1968) application for a passport which the Court and passport agency refuse to acknowledge. 

Top of page 14.  I have provided a birth certificate to establish my identity.  I have met my burden.  If the Department  of State says that I have a SSN then why don’t they  just fill in the blank with whatever number they choose and moot this prolonged and unnecessary litigation?  Too easy.  Better to lie and try to deceive.  The government is telling the lie and the burden of proof is on them.

Neither Tennessee nor Westinghouse create nor assign Social Security numbers.  If a Westinghouse/Passport form says that a social security number is 123-45-6789 and that my name is Mickey M. Mouse, does that make it so?  No.  The Westinghouse/Passport form dated 6 June 1974, uses the name of Russell F. Walker.  I have submitted several pieces of evidence including my original birth certificate showing my name as Francis  R. Walker.  Is the US Passport agency going to be happy  with a name from one birth certificate and an alias SSN with a different name from some other source and create the first recorded passport with a dual source of information and knowing lies?  If I file an application with such a hybrid lie, will the US Attorney grant me immunity or will I be subject to criminal prosecution for perjury?

Page 16 You cite Califano v. Torres and Haig v. AgeeCalifano states that the right of interstate travel is virtually unqualified, they just qualify you whenever they choose making any Constitutional protection useless.  What a sick joke!  We either have a right or we don’t.  It is black and white. 

In Haig, Agee had his passport revoked because it was believed that Agee was a threat to national security.   Agee was even offered an administrative hearing in West Germany.

From Wikipedia -- In December 1979, Secretary of State Cyrus Vance revoked Agee's passport and delivered an explanatory notice to Agee in West Germany, where he was living. It advised Agee that his activities abroad were causing or were likely to cause serious damage to the national security or the foreign policy of the United States and that he had a right to an administrative hearing.  It offered to hold such a hearing in West Germany on 5 days' notice.

 I was never offered an administrative hearing just the back of the hand from my public servants.   When do I get an administrative hearing where the government can show me where my social security number is and provide a copy of my Social Security application?   I guess the State Department considers me to be a threat to national security like Agee.  I guess I can no longer travel with my Turban, burka and long flowing robes were I hide my illegal machine guns and stash of drugs.  

Top page 17.  “rationally related to a legitimate state interest”.  I guess that the government is interested in my drug, weapons, prostitution, body parts and nuclear businesses.  I do not need to rebut these government interests because they do NOT and never have applied to me.  Apparently people have no interests or rights and we all have to bow down to the government as God.  That is what this case is ultimately about.  Is there any exception to “legitimate government interest”?  Apparently not when we have no protections we are no better than tattooed and chipped animals in the farm yard. 

Page 19.  You have told a blatant  lie regarding Rule 11.  I supplied copies of my birth certificate, baptismal certificate, past passport, U.S. transportation card etc. and you say that I have not supplied any evidence.  Can you provide something better than an original birth certificate?

Page 20.  No for contesting the government’s  lies I am now accused of lying when the government has not produced any SS application and has only put on a side show with irrelevant materials.

I never wanted a civil action, only a passport.  I guess that is unreasonable.  Well if telling the truth is a fraud then I plead guilty.

Commentary on Text Order dated 3/7/18

I find this text order to be especially dishonest because it creates the illusion that this Court is protecting my privacy and tries to create the illusion of justice while denying me actual justice.   The State motto is Esse quam videri,  “To be rather than to seem.”  If that does not fit here I don’t know what does.  You can put my names, real and alias, birth date, NAZI SSN, drivers license number, address etc. on the front of the Courthouse in three foot high letters and I could utterly care less. I am still being held in a big jail not being able to leave or return.

AUSA Steven Baker

Steve why don’t you end this madness, call the Passport Office, tell them to issue me a passport, name and number of their choosing.  Tell them that I am giving up my international arms,  Uranium sales, drug trafficking, money laundering activities etc. and will be a good obedient boy. 

Incidentally will the government refund my application fee?  If I steal it is a crime but the government can steal with impunity. 

I guess I can expect to be indicted in a FISA Court on 6-7 counts under 18 USC §0, for “Telling the truth  under penalties of perjury”.  It will be interesting to see what name will be on the Indictment, my birth certificate name or my alias social security name.

This 75 year old man with serious health issues may never take another trip even if I have 10 passports but the Chemical Engineer in me will still stand up for the truth.  I am looking forward to the day when you are chipped and just to make sure, tattooed.  I will be cold and dead in the cemetery but my words will say, “What goes around comes around.”  For the rest of your life you will never forget this case. We will see who laughs last. 
Social Security Comment

The time is coming when this zero-sum Ponzi scheme thing called Social Security will go bankrupt.  You can be sure however that the “Not for Identification” NAZI SS numbers will remain and people will finally figure out that that numbers and traveling papers were the real original intent.

Final Comment

Catherine, I know nothing about you.  Presumably you are married, have children and possibly grandchildren.  Someday probably when I am in the cemetery, your grandchild will ask you how this country became such an absolute tyranny.   You can answer, ONE STEP AT A TIME, because the federal judges always gave the government an excuse.  “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”  Lord Acton.  Ayn Rand said that, “The time would come when people could only do what the government allowed them to do.” Well that time is now for sure.

My favorite verse in the Bible is the last verse in Ecclesiastes. 

Ecc. 12:14  “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.”  On judgment day this case is going to be rubbed in your and Baker’s faces and the real judgment will take place.  I don’t want either of you to have any excuses.  My sincere sympathies to your grandchild however.

Another anecdote

In 1985 after a dispute over a $45 dollar airplane ticket, I was arrested and brought before a judge (Dauer).  Bail was set at $100,000 straight.  After being taken to jail, I was then beaten by 8-9 guards in the jail and put in a psychiatric ward for three days.  See Russell F. Walker vs. People Express Inc. et al, 886 F.2d 598 (1989).  The opinion does not begin to tell the whole story but you can see from the caption that there is much more there.  I learned more about criminal law and due process in my three days in the psychiatric ward than I ever learned in law school.  I was freed due to TV exposure of the matter.  At trial I watched 8-9 jail guards lie through their teeth and the jury bought it.  Don’t ever tell me about the wisdom of juries.  Inter alia, People Express went out of business and the Allegheny County jail was put under federal Court supervision after that.  My last “flashback” from that beating was in 2003.  Don’t anyone ever tell me about justice in the United States.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746 all statements herein are subject to the penalties of perjury.

Respectfully submitted,


Francis R. Walker


                                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                                  FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Francis R. Walker,                                             )                 

Plaintiff                                                            )

vs.                                                                   )

Rex Tillerson, U.S. Secretary of State                 )    C.A. No. 1:17-cv-732

   and                                                                )
Director Passport Services, Dept. of State          )       

                             Defendants                          )


                                               CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT

This Rule 59 Motion complies with the word count limit set forth in L.R. 7.3(d) in that the entire brief including Certificate of Service and Certificate of Word Count is about 3400 words.

Francis R. Walker

                                                CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have placed a copy of this Plaintiff’s response to Order of March 7, 2018, postage prepaid on 12 March 2018 to:

Steven Baker, AUSA
United States Attorney
101 S. Edgeworth Street, 4th Floor
Greensboro, NC 27401                                                   


Francis R. Walker