by various authors

Essay 1 --
For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites. The hypothesis to be tested: Can a 
people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population? The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since. Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball. Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless hand-wringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No To Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment. Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing. Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and majority-black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment. Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, more opportunities. But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.” But since 1965, when the elites opened America’s doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India–people who are not white, not rich, and not “connected”  –  have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime–crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it, that has nothing to do with poverty. The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility. Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity. The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.

Essay 2 --

in the entire history of sub-Saharan Africa, no person or group ever invented the wheel, made a water proof boat, created a written language, built a two story structure or ever discovered any scientific principle and yet some people state that all races are equal.

Essay 3 --

Equal opportunity is neither equal nor opportunity.  It is blatant racism posing as a solution to racism.

Essay 4 --

There is nothing affirmative about affirmative action.  It is rank discrimination and destroys the incentive of the better qualified as well as the all men are created equal non-sense.Roger 1 hour ago

Essay 5 --

While only 13% of the population in the USA is black 93% of all black murder victims are murdered by another black 85% of all violent interracial crimes are committed by blacks 80% of all shootings are committed by blacks 79% of all robberies are committed by blacks... 59% of all murders are committed by blacks 52% of all violent juvenile crimes are committed by blacks 49% of all murder victims are black 45% of all drug offenses are committed by blacks 42% of all cop killers are black 8% of America’s population are black men, yet they account for 40% of America’s total prison population. 99% of all major riots involving property damage, looting and civil disobedience are committed by blacks as opposed to ANY OTHER minority in America. Blacks Commit 25X more Violent Assaults against Whites than Whites against Blacks. And the most amazing statistic of all; 33% of all crimes in America are committed by 3% of the population; blacks between the ages of 16 and 36 40% of blacks are on welfare (US Census) Only 59% blacks graduate high school (only 20% in Detroit) Over 60% of black households have no fathers present 72% of black mothers are unwed, 72%! (Dept. of Justice, FBI and USA Census)There is no doubt that Soros funded the antifa rioters in Charlottesville. They were not granted a permit, but marched anyway - and showed up with baseball bats and Pepsi cans full of cement, looking for trouble. The police let the violence continue. The city's deputy mayor is a black racist, and the mayor declared Charlottesville "resistance city" some time ago. The Democrats wanted violence because they think it will work in their favor. They are grossly mistaken. We will not fall for it.

Seth Rich copied the DNC files. There was no Russian hacking. Computer experts said the data was downloaded from the computer at a speed of about 23 MB per second. That is thumb drive speed. No Internet connection in mid-2016 could have copied the files that quickly. (That report comes from the leftist The Nation.) Seth Rich copied the data and sold it to WikiLeaks. He was then killed for doing so.

Essay 6 --  Regarding Charlottesville, VA

Yes, the neo-Nazis are thugs and morons. But their numbers are small and they can be ignored. Give them no media attention and they will disappear. But now the media leftists and the Dems and the CIA are circling in the water. They are out for Trump's blood and will stop at nothing.

There is stupidity on the white nationalist side. But there is unmitigated evil on the demo-socialist side.

The Democrats have won elections by dividing one group against another. That got them quite far. Their problem now is that in supporting black racists, gays, trannies, freaks, Hispanic gangs, illegal aliens, Muslims, etc. they have driven millions of whites out of the Democrat Party. Now they are stuck because they are in the minority. They cannot get the white vote back, so their only option is to drive a wedge between white voters. That worked in 2008 and 2012 when they pitted whites without race guilt against whites with race guilt.  But Obama was such an evil, Marxist dunce that he drove those two white groups together, and Trump took advantage of it. The leftists are now doing their best to split the whites into two groups: normal white Americans and neo-Nazis. That tactic will not work, because the more they act against whites, the more the whites will bond together. (And the neo-Nazis are too small in number to matter anyway.) The demo-socialists overplayed their hand and now the Democrat Party will collapse. The 2018 and 2020 elections will be Americans against Socialists, and the Americans will win. The average voter sees what's going on, and the media leftists are only making things worse for the Democrat Party.

There is no doubt that Soros funded the Antifa rioters in Charlottesville. They were not granted a permit, but marched anyway - and showed up with baseball bats and Pepsi cans full of cement, looking for trouble. The police let the violence continue. The city's deputy mayor is a black racist, and the mayor declared Charlottesville "resistance city" some time ago. The Democrats wanted violence because they think it will work in their favor. They are grossly mistaken. We will not fall for it.

Seth Rich copied the DNC files. There was no Russian hacking. Computer experts said the data was downloaded off the computer at a speed of about 23 MB per second. That is thumb drive speed. No Internet connection in mid-2016 could have copied the files that quickly. (That report comes from the leftist The Nation.) Seth Rich copied the data and sold it to WikiLeaks. He was then killed for doing so.

Essay 7 --

[(Spencer Platt via Getty Images)]

In the wake of widespread backlash against its profile of a Nazi sympathizer, The New York Times said on Sunday (November 26, 2017) it regrets offending readers and defended elements of the story criticized as normalizing white extremism. 

“Our reporter and his editors agonized over the tone and content of the article,” Times national editor Marc Lacey wrote in a response to readers. “The point of the story was not to normalize anything but to describe the degree to which hate and extremism have become far more normal in American life than many of us want to think.”

The story, which ran on Saturday, spotlighted white supremacist Tony Hovater of New Carlisle, Ohio. The portrait of the “Nazi sympathizer next door” and his hatred for Jews, admiration for Adolf Hitler and belief in racial segregation is told against the backdrop of him cooking pasta at home, contemplating his honeymoon and enjoying “Seinfeld” ― all details critics say inadvertently normalized people like Hovater.

In its response, the Times said some saw the value in using those details to show how easy it is for the average American to adopt such radical views. “People mad about this article want to believe that Nazis are monsters we cannot relate to,” the Times quoted from Mother Jones reporter Shane Bauer’s tweet. 

The point of the story was not to normalize anything but to describe the degree to which hate and extremism have become far more normal in American life than many of us want to think. New York Times national editor Marc Lacey

Many critics of the profile agreed with that sentiment, but also said the Times went wrong by failing to address why and how Hovater developed his extreme beliefs. 

Richard Fausset, the profile’s author, admitted in a followup piece Saturday that those unasked questions about Hovater were “a hole at the heart of [his] story.” When a Times editor told him that, in a first draft, those questions “had not been sufficiently addressed,” Fausset returned for more reporting on Hovater in search of answers, but came up empty.

“I beat myself up about all of this for a while, until I decided that the unfilled hole would have to serve as both feature and defect,” Fausset wrote. The Times’ response on Sunday, however, does not directly address this shortcoming or its decision to publish the story despite it. 

“We recognize that people can disagree on how best to tell a disagreeable story,” the Times said in conclusion. “What we think is indisputable, though, is the need to shed more light, not less, on the most extreme corners of American life and the people who inhabit them. That’s what the story, however imperfectly, tried to do.”

The Times did say it erred in judgment by including in the profile a link to a site that sells swastika armbands.

“This was intended to show the darker reality beyond the anodyne language of the website. But we saw the criticism, agreed and removed the link.”


Essay 8 --

"Stop The Hate Against Mormons" new


First of all, I find it offensive that antis, ex-Mormons and never mos like you and your ilk not only attack Mormonism as a religion, but the people. Mormons in the United States are basically an ethnic minority. They descend from the bloodlines of the Pioneers, who were themselves pure Nordic stock, the highest of which is found in this nation. Mormons have unique traditions, cuisine, art, music, language, rituals, history, etc. They fit the definition of an ethnic group and by the anti-Mormons constantly ridiculing and persecuting them, you are basically being a bigot toward a minority group.

Imagine if I called a black the N-word or made fun of soul food, rap music, or black culture. I would be called a racist. But, with Mormons, anything goes. Double standard. But, that's not why I want to talk to you. I want to set something straight about blacks and Mormonism.

The priesthood ban was justified and STILL is justifiable. Blacks are a peculiar group and not at all similar to regular white communities or even the average member of the human race.

Blacks have kinky, matted, coily hair that doesn't grow long and is always dry and unpleasant to the touch. Their hair is a clear corruption of the normal silky, long, healthy hair found in white populations. How a "Human" could grow hair as unsightly and unhealthy as blacks should be an instant red flag. Normal people don't have hair like that.

Black skin causes problems such as vitamin D deficiency, oily skin, and unsightliness. Blacks don't display typical human functions such as blushing. Women can't use makeup to enhance their appearance when their skin is so dark, nothing will show up.

Blacks have far higher rates of diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, STDs, and other problems. They are a disease-ridden group. Blacks have lower cognitive functions and IQ levels.

Blacks are the least desirable of all races.

Take this into account and you actually question a curse? It's the mark of Cain, plain and simple. And it continues to this day. Until the blacks clean up their communities and stop mooching off of white society, then they'll always be cursed.

As for you and your anti-Mormon socialists, either apply the same standard across the board or stop mocking Mormons, an actual ethnic group with a history of persecution.

That's another thing: Mormons were slaughtered in droves by Non-Mormons and ex-Mormons. Men, women, and children brutally murdered in atrocities. But, we spend more time on Blacks than Mormons for some reason, even though they don't face near the amount of direct trauma, esp in today's society where the Liberals pander to them and give them everything


Essay 9 --

Mueller’s Tyrannical Indictment = the Very Reason We had a Revolution

Posted Feb 19, 2018 by Martin Armstrong

The Grand Jury was supposed to protect citizens from political prosecutions determining only “probable cause” if the government presents their skewed side to claim a crime might have been made, but it has been completely undermined and serves nothing close to its constitutional purpose. The Grand Jury is just a political tool for they get to hear ONLY the evidence that the government selects. There is absolutely NO REQUIREMENT that a prosecutor must make a fair presentment of the facts and indeed they are NEVER true and correct for there is no obligation to present the alternative or the defense of the person being indicted.

The Supreme Court wrote quite eloquently what the Grand Jury was supposed to do. “The … grand jury … has the dual function of determining if there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and of protecting citizens against unfounded criminal prosecutions.” Branzburg v Hayes, 408 US 665, 686-687 (1972).

What has long been held as common practice, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1976 ruled in Imbler v. Pachtman 424 U.S. 409 (1976), that prosecutors cannot face civil lawsuits for prosecutorial abuses, no matter how severe. Prosecutors have qualified immunity in other activities such as advising police and speaking to the press. This was the decision that means Mueller can say anything in an indictment for he is completely immune even if he is knowingly lying to the public. He gets to do what nobody else can do and this has undermined everything that the Constitution stood for.

There are no checks and balance in the American Justice System which flies in the face of the Declaration of Independence, which criticised the very same immunity the King provided to his prosecutors.

“He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone … He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance … For protecting (government agents) them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States”

Declaration of Independence

Prosecutors routinely mislead grand juries and provide only allegations to show guilt. An indictment is completely bogus and should NEVER be taken as fact for that violates the entire Constitution. The defendant has no right to present his side and the Supreme Court said that the trial jury will correct any injustice. This is what makes Mueller’s indictment fake news for he knows that there is zero chance of getting a trial so the indictment can say whatever he wants and CNN, New York Times, POLITICO etc., will all treat it as absolute proven fact.

In a decision by Judges Evans, Posner, and Easterbrook of the 7th Circuit (Chicago), they wrote in 2005 the truth about the Grand Jury process:

“Realistically, federal grand juries today provide little protection for criminal suspects whom a US Attorney wishes to indict. Nevertheless, that is not a realism to which judges are permitted to yield.”

US v Ross, 412 F3d 771, 774 (7th Circuit 2005)

The former Chief Judge of New York, Sol Wachtler, became famous for the modern legal comment on how bad the Grand Jury process had become. His comment became immortalized in the Tom Wolfe novel, Bonfire of the Vanities (1987). Judge Wachtler’s review of the Grand Jury became the famous phrase that a grand jury could “indict a ham sandwich,” if that’s what you wanted because the prosecutors are totally unsupervised in bringing indictments. He later said that he coined the phrase during a lunch interview with Marcia Kramer of the New York Daily News.

The Grand Jury has simply become the tyranny that has destroyed every Empire historically. There is no judge present so the proceeding is led by a prosecutor, in this case, Mueller. The defendant has absolutely no right to present his case or even to be informed that a prosecutor is conducting a Grand Jury proceeding at all. Court reporters usually transcribe the proceedings, but the records are sealed. The case for such secrecy was unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court in Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 US 211 (1979). The rationale to support secrecy was explained that “if pre-indictment proceedings were made public, many prospective witnesses would be hesitant to come forward voluntarily”; “witnesses who appeared before the grand jury would be less likely to testify fully and frankly”; and “there also would be the risk that those about to be indicted would flee, or would try to influence individual grand jurors”.

The Venetian Mouth of Truth was precisely what the Supreme Court used to justify secrecy. Anyone could write an allegation against anyone else and they did not have to disclose who they were. They dropped the slip into the Mouth of Truth and that was enough to arrest the person and torture them until they confessed.

Once the person was arrested and crossed the Bridge of Sighs to the prison, they never again returned. The mere accusation was proof of guilt precisely as Mueller has just carried out.

On top of that, the hypocrisy, in this case, knows no bounds. The United States has interfered in just about everyone’s election. The Obama Administration interfered in the Canadian, British, and French elections to try to push for socialists to win and defeat BRXIT. Obama pissed-off the British by going of British TV and told them if they voted to leave the EU, then they should get to the “back of the queue” on trade agreement negotiations if they leave the EU.

The political propaganda team that got Bill Clinton elected was there in London helping Tony Blair get elected in Britain. The NSA was spying on Merkel and Merkel with the NSA was spying on France and the EU Commission.

Consequently, the strongest count in Mueller’s indictment is that the Russians failed to register and formally tell the US people they were acting politically within the US system. I find this very unethical when in fact the USA does this very same thing routinely to everyone else.


“Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally conspired to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of the Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of State in administering federal requirements for disclosure of foreign involvement in certain domestic activities.”

Mueller's Indictment

The Obama Administration came out and stated that despite Russian attempts to hack the election, the result was not altered. This has been a political witch hunt for there is nothing that took place that (1) altered the results, and (2) nothing that the US government does not do in other countries.

The ONLY way to secure our liberty is to overrule Prosecutorial Immunity and upon someone being indicted, the transcript MUST be made public. Otherwise, protecting the very people who appear before the Grand Jury to get an indictment remain in secret and can never be called by the defendant denying him the right to confrontation.

Mueller has proven we still live under Tyranny. The Grand Jury minutes MUST be made public since this is a political indictment and he knows there will NEVER be a trial. The American people and the world are entitled to the WHOLE TRUTH andNOTHING BUT THE TRUTH!